<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for James L Farrell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jameslfarrell.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jameslfarrell.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:58:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on FUSION: MORE THAN MULTISENSOR INTEGRATION by Directorio de Articulos</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/kalman-filter/fusion-more-than-multisensor-integration/comment-page-1#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Directorio de Articulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=375#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[..] Publicar articulos en directorio de articulos [..]...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sitio para publicar articulos gratis y promocionarse en la web......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[..] Publicar articulos en directorio de articulos [..]&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sitio para publicar articulos gratis y promocionarse en la web&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Surveillance with GPS/GNSS by James L Farrell</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/surveillance/comment-page-1#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>James L Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/uncategorized/154#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s true that this isn&#039;t a new item at all.  I&#039;ve received that same response -- not a new issue -- from a number of my presentations in various forums.  My answer has always been
 * the issue wasn&#039;t old when I first raised it
 * more time elapsed since then makes the advocacy progressively stronger
 * the fact that it isn&#039;t new is all the more reason why changes should have occurred by now
 * despite all that, inertia from old habits continues to direct current + planned procedures
 * reasons to change accepted practices are growing inexorably.
As an example of the last point, see 
&quot;FAA Estimates $70+ Billion in Costs, Nearly 800 Deaths, Due to LightSquared Interference to GPS&quot;   at http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2718.  Rest assured that further challenges will arise with passage of more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that this isn&#8217;t a new item at all.  I&#8217;ve received that same response &#8212; not a new issue &#8212; from a number of my presentations in various forums.  My answer has always been<br />
 * the issue wasn&#8217;t old when I first raised it<br />
 * more time elapsed since then makes the advocacy progressively stronger<br />
 * the fact that it isn&#8217;t new is all the more reason why changes should have occurred by now<br />
 * despite all that, inertia from old habits continues to direct current + planned procedures<br />
 * reasons to change accepted practices are growing inexorably.<br />
As an example of the last point, see<br />
&#8220;FAA Estimates $70+ Billion in Costs, Nearly 800 Deaths, Due to LightSquared Interference to GPS&#8221;   at <a href="http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2718" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidegnss.com/node/2718</a>.  Rest assured that further challenges will arise with passage of more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on COLLISION AVOIDANCE BY DECELERATION by Publicar Articulos</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/332/comment-page-1#comment-2905</link>
		<dc:creator>Publicar Articulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 12:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=332#comment-2905</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Publica Articulos...&lt;/strong&gt;

Directorio de Articulos...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Publica Articulos&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Directorio de Articulos&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DEAD RECKONING by GPS CARRIER PHASE by James L Farrell</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/dead-reckoning-by-gps-carrier-phase/comment-page-1#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>James L Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=564#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Your comment is, as the saying goes, &quot;as welcome as the flowers in May&quot; -- because you&#039;re in a key position to affect operational systems.  That&#039;s exactly my goal - to see the benefits of these innovations in wide usage throughout a broad range of real-world applications.  Ultimately that includes helicopters you mentioned plus all fixed-wing aircraft (avionics) plus land vehicles (vetronics) and shipboard electronics.  I&#039;ve also started a dialogue with NASA for possible retention of interrupted carrier phase tracks for orbit determination.

As you undoubtedly know, even the most upbeat enthusiasts of satellite navigation have been &quot;worrying-in-public&quot; about so many problems.  To name just a few -- a large and growing onslaught of L-band interference sources; &lt;a href=&quot;http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/gnss09.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;satellite aging&lt;/a&gt;; GNSS interoperability growing pains -- the litany goes on and on.  Especially with expected air traffic growth, continued reliance on methods that are now decades old would jeopardize future operation.

I&#039;m not the only one anxious to see the requisite sea change in &lt;a href=&quot;http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/robust.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;robustness&lt;/a&gt;.  Within limits (not wanting to come across like a self-appointed guru nor any kind of trouble-maker) I&#039;ve been beating the drum.  My concerns have appeared in ION Journal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.insidegnss.com/node/842&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;InsideGNSS&lt;/a&gt;, GPSWorld &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsworld.com/transportation/aviation/between-lines-a-fortuitous-meeting-10540&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;news&lt;/a&gt; + articles (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/expert-advice-accuracy-more-position-only-4200&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Feb. 2008&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpsworld.com/transportation/aviation/expert-advice-availability-gaps-solutions-aviation-9182&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dec 2009&lt;/a&gt;) + TechTalk&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://techtalk.sidt.gpsworld.com/?p=723&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Aug. 2010&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://techtalk.sidt.gpsworld.com/?p=249&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;July 2008&lt;/a&gt; plus Air Traffic Control Journal (Summer 2008) and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auoNAd-JP4A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nine-minute YouTube presentation&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/publist.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;published articles&lt;/a&gt; (some of them can be downloaded from this site).

What&#039;s been used up to now has clearly earned its highest praise and accolades -- but continuation of that success is by no means assured.  Solutions offered by the methods under discussion here -- crucially -- are available at low cost.   Partial information, largely wasted but fully usable from any channel coming from any constellation&#039;s satellites, can provide intrinsic interoperability for producing precise streaming velocity (table at the bottom of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/p1flyer.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;flyer&lt;/a&gt;) with rigorous integrity testing for each separate measurement.  In addition, this flexibility will enable ready adaptation to changes in future conditions -- another major benefit absent from today&#039;s systems.

I don&#039;t expect dramatic changes overnight in systems already mechanized nor in plans that have gone so far for near-term updates,  To look at the longer time span (or not so long if major problems arise soon), though, modest-sized projects like yours will become especially valuable.  They will expedite remedial action, mitigating future emergencies.

In order to do this, you&#039;ll need accurate carrier phase (e.g., at 1-Hz, but with discontinuities and unresolved cycle counts entirely acceptable) from your GPS unit.  Most of what you can buy won&#039;t give that, but the capability can be had at low cost.  I&#039;m really glad to hear of your involvement in these developments.  It shows your awareness of the huge opportunities awaiting those who use the info to provide needed direction.  I&#039;m glad to be communicating with you once again and I&#039;m quite optimistic about your success in this effort,
                                      JLF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment is, as the saying goes, &#8220;as welcome as the flowers in May&#8221; &#8212; because you&#8217;re in a key position to affect operational systems.  That&#8217;s exactly my goal &#8211; to see the benefits of these innovations in wide usage throughout a broad range of real-world applications.  Ultimately that includes helicopters you mentioned plus all fixed-wing aircraft (avionics) plus land vehicles (vetronics) and shipboard electronics.  I&#8217;ve also started a dialogue with NASA for possible retention of interrupted carrier phase tracks for orbit determination.</p>
<p>As you undoubtedly know, even the most upbeat enthusiasts of satellite navigation have been &#8220;worrying-in-public&#8221; about so many problems.  To name just a few &#8212; a large and growing onslaught of L-band interference sources; <a href="http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/gnss09.pdf" rel="nofollow">satellite aging</a>; GNSS interoperability growing pains &#8212; the litany goes on and on.  Especially with expected air traffic growth, continued reliance on methods that are now decades old would jeopardize future operation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the only one anxious to see the requisite sea change in <a href="http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/robust.pdf" rel="nofollow">robustness</a>.  Within limits (not wanting to come across like a self-appointed guru nor any kind of trouble-maker) I&#8217;ve been beating the drum.  My concerns have appeared in ION Journal, <a href="http://www.insidegnss.com/node/842" rel="nofollow">InsideGNSS</a>, GPSWorld <a href="http://www.gpsworld.com/transportation/aviation/between-lines-a-fortuitous-meeting-10540" rel="nofollow">news</a> + articles (<a href="http://www.gpsworld.com/gnss-system/expert-advice-accuracy-more-position-only-4200" rel="nofollow">Feb. 2008</a> &#038; <a href="http://www.gpsworld.com/transportation/aviation/expert-advice-availability-gaps-solutions-aviation-9182" rel="nofollow">Dec 2009</a>) + TechTalk <a href="http://techtalk.sidt.gpsworld.com/?p=723" rel="nofollow">Aug. 2010</a> &#038; <a href="http://techtalk.sidt.gpsworld.com/?p=249" rel="nofollow">July 2008</a> plus Air Traffic Control Journal (Summer 2008) and a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=auoNAd-JP4A" rel="nofollow">nine-minute YouTube presentation</a>, and <a href="http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/publist.pdf" rel="nofollow">published articles</a> (some of them can be downloaded from this site).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s been used up to now has clearly earned its highest praise and accolades &#8212; but continuation of that success is by no means assured.  Solutions offered by the methods under discussion here &#8212; crucially &#8212; are available at low cost.   Partial information, largely wasted but fully usable from any channel coming from any constellation&#8217;s satellites, can provide intrinsic interoperability for producing precise streaming velocity (table at the bottom of the <a href="http://jameslfarrell.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/p1flyer.pdf" rel="nofollow">flyer</a>) with rigorous integrity testing for each separate measurement.  In addition, this flexibility will enable ready adaptation to changes in future conditions &#8212; another major benefit absent from today&#8217;s systems.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t expect dramatic changes overnight in systems already mechanized nor in plans that have gone so far for near-term updates,  To look at the longer time span (or not so long if major problems arise soon), though, modest-sized projects like yours will become especially valuable.  They will expedite remedial action, mitigating future emergencies.</p>
<p>In order to do this, you&#8217;ll need accurate carrier phase (e.g., at 1-Hz, but with discontinuities and unresolved cycle counts entirely acceptable) from your GPS unit.  Most of what you can buy won&#8217;t give that, but the capability can be had at low cost.  I&#8217;m really glad to hear of your involvement in these developments.  It shows your awareness of the huge opportunities awaiting those who use the info to provide needed direction.  I&#8217;m glad to be communicating with you once again and I&#8217;m quite optimistic about your success in this effort,<br />
                                      JLF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DEAD RECKONING by GPS CARRIER PHASE by Eric Bechhoefer</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/dead-reckoning-by-gps-carrier-phase/comment-page-1#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Bechhoefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=564#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>Hi Jim,

Very cool - I want to try this. I&#039;m think about how this would improve current HUMS systems, which typically need a serial interface into the aircraft avionics. It seems that, due to the complexity of just interfacing with existing systems, it would be better to role your own GPS system. This would be a great technique to implement. This would support FOQA, a FFA future requirement for medium/EMS helicopter (hence, a good thing to role into HUMS)

thx
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jim,</p>
<p>Very cool &#8211; I want to try this. I&#8217;m think about how this would improve current HUMS systems, which typically need a serial interface into the aircraft avionics. It seems that, due to the complexity of just interfacing with existing systems, it would be better to role your own GPS system. This would be a great technique to implement. This would support FOQA, a FFA future requirement for medium/EMS helicopter (hence, a good thing to role into HUMS)</p>
<p>thx<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KALMAN FILTER or SUBOPTIMAL &#8211; DOES IT MATTER? by James L Farrell</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/tracking/kalman-filter-or-suboptimal-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>James L Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=345#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the reason why I removed your post -- and all your previous posts:  Our goals are completely different.
This site presents information focused on navigation and tracking only.  I have no intention to introduce
money-making schemes through SEO using advertisements.
Because of that focus,
* I routinely disapprove almost all comments submitted to this site, and
* your comment — not relevant to navigation and tracking — will appear here for a short time only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the reason why I removed your post &#8212; and all your previous posts:  Our goals are completely different.<br />
This site presents information focused on navigation and tracking only.  I have no intention to introduce<br />
money-making schemes through SEO using advertisements.<br />
Because of that focus,<br />
* I routinely disapprove almost all comments submitted to this site, and<br />
* your comment — not relevant to navigation and tracking — will appear here for a short time only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KALMAN FILTER or SUBOPTIMAL &#8211; DOES IT MATTER? by aircraft registrations in texas</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/tracking/kalman-filter-or-suboptimal-does-it-matter/comment-page-1#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>aircraft registrations in texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=345#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>At the lower left corner of the Home page (or of several other pages), there&#039;s a small orange-&amp;-white icon for RSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the lower left corner of the Home page (or of several other pages), there&#8217;s a small orange-&amp;-white icon for RSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GNSS Aided Navigation and Tracking by James L Farrell</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/published-books-gnss-aided-navigation-and-tracking/gnss-aided-navigation-and-tracking/comment-page-1#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>James L Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?page_id=99#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Overnight shipping is $20.00 USD.  Apologies for the delay in response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overnight shipping is $20.00 USD.  Apologies for the delay in response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FUSION: MORE THAN MULTISENSOR INTEGRATION by writing online</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/kalman-filter/fusion-more-than-multisensor-integration/comment-page-1#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>writing online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=375#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Dear administrator...  I am Lydia  Hsiao and I am an English teacher staying in Washington. I&#039;d prefer to be direct. I am requesting for links to my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.my-english-writing.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;example essays&lt;/A&gt; instructional site and I would be glad if you would agree to my link here. My website is a 100 percent free website that assists non-native speakers on the fundamentals of writing essays and I am positive that ESL students will find it useful. Once more, I wish you will agreed to my thread, and I thank you in earnest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear administrator&#8230;  I am Lydia  Hsiao and I am an English teacher staying in Washington. I&#8217;d prefer to be direct. I am requesting for links to my <a href="http://www.my-english-writing.com" rel="nofollow">example essays</a> instructional site and I would be glad if you would agree to my link here. My website is a 100 percent free website that assists non-native speakers on the fundamentals of writing essays and I am positive that ESL students will find it useful. Once more, I wish you will agreed to my thread, and I thank you in earnest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SINGLE-MEASUREMENT RAIM by James L Farrell</title>
		<link>http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/single-measurement-raim-2/comment-page-1#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>James L Farrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jameslfarrell.com/?p=533#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Being involved in car electronics you&#039;re probably aware of efforts to develop automated means of collision avoidance for cars.  The intent is good and important steps are being introduced toward that eventual goal, but everything I&#039;ve seen so far using GPS has one feature in need of improvement: Spatial separations are formed by subtracting coordinates.  With GPS, different receivers can select different satellites; those coordinate differences contain errors that don&#039;t cancel.  Furthermore, signal blockage plus several degradations can prevent a receiver from having enough satellites with enough geometric spread to form a credible location.  That&#039;s just &quot;the tip of the iceberg.&quot;

A blog &quot;Collision avoidance by deceleration&quot; at http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/332
has a link to a 10-minute YouTube presentation.  It&#039;s for aircraft, so it would require much change for application to cars.  But some of the principles would be relevant -- e.g., transmitting measurements NOT coordinates would provide a giant improvement in performance. 

That basic idea, &quot;Send Measurements, not Coordinates&quot; is the title of a 1999 Institute-of-Navigation Journal paper (v46, n3) showing, in the Introduction, eight reasons for dramatic supeiority of measurements over coordinates (e.g., cancellation of major errors; no augmentation system needed; retention of partial information when some satellite signals are missing; optimization of estimates for dynamics as well as position; insensitivity to misunderstanding of datum reference; etc.).  An Air Traffic Control Journal (Summer 2008 issue) lists an even longer set of considerations.  Although written for aviation, many of the principles are applicable to cars as well.

I have other blogs on the website that also overlap the topic to some extent. In addition, over 100 pages of a recent book are freely viewable.  The longest chapter of that book, the ninth, concentrates entirely on tracking.  I hope this information will be found useful to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being involved in car electronics you&#8217;re probably aware of efforts to develop automated means of collision avoidance for cars.  The intent is good and important steps are being introduced toward that eventual goal, but everything I&#8217;ve seen so far using GPS has one feature in need of improvement: Spatial separations are formed by subtracting coordinates.  With GPS, different receivers can select different satellites; those coordinate differences contain errors that don&#8217;t cancel.  Furthermore, signal blockage plus several degradations can prevent a receiver from having enough satellites with enough geometric spread to form a credible location.  That&#8217;s just &#8220;the tip of the iceberg.&#8221;</p>
<p>A blog &#8220;Collision avoidance by deceleration&#8221; at <a href="http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/332" rel="nofollow">http://jameslfarrell.com/gps-gnss/332</a><br />
has a link to a 10-minute YouTube presentation.  It&#8217;s for aircraft, so it would require much change for application to cars.  But some of the principles would be relevant &#8212; e.g., transmitting measurements NOT coordinates would provide a giant improvement in performance. </p>
<p>That basic idea, &#8220;Send Measurements, not Coordinates&#8221; is the title of a 1999 Institute-of-Navigation Journal paper (v46, n3) showing, in the Introduction, eight reasons for dramatic supeiority of measurements over coordinates (e.g., cancellation of major errors; no augmentation system needed; retention of partial information when some satellite signals are missing; optimization of estimates for dynamics as well as position; insensitivity to misunderstanding of datum reference; etc.).  An Air Traffic Control Journal (Summer 2008 issue) lists an even longer set of considerations.  Although written for aviation, many of the principles are applicable to cars as well.</p>
<p>I have other blogs on the website that also overlap the topic to some extent. In addition, over 100 pages of a recent book are freely viewable.  The longest chapter of that book, the ninth, concentrates entirely on tracking.  I hope this information will be found useful to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

