Blog Layout

BOOK on TRACKING

BOOK on TRACKING

Tracking acceleration dynamics by GNSS, radar, imaging

 

In addition to the flight-validated algorithms for navigation (processing of inertial sensor data, integration with GPS/GNSS , integrity, etc.) my 2007 book, as its title implies, offers extensive coverage of tracking . The longest chapter of the book (Chapter 9) provides formulations for a variety of modes, in 2-D (e.g., for runway incursion prevention or ships) and 3-D (in-air), using GPS/GNSS and/or other sensors (e.g., radar , optical).  Position and velocity vectors are formed, in some operations joined by some or all components of acceleration .


This author was “at-the-right-places at-the-right-times” when a need arose to address each of the topics covered.  As a result, the words of one reviewer — that the book is “teeming with insights that are hard to find or unavailable elsewhere” 

applies to tracking as well as to navigation.  The book identifies subtleties that arise in specific applications ( aircraft , ships, land vehicles, satellites, long-range or short-range projectiles , reentry vehicles, missiles , … ). In combination with a variety of possible conditions affecting sensor suite and location (air-to-air; air-to-ground; air-to-sea surface; surface-to-air, etc. — with measurements associated with distance or direction or both; shared or not shared among participants who may communicate from different positions), it is not surprising that striking contrasts can arise, influencing approaches and characterizations used.  The array of formulations offered, while fully accounting for marked differences among operations, nevertheless exploits an underlying commonality to the maximum possible extent.


Tracking dynamics of aircraft, missiles, ships, satellites, projectiles, …

Formulations described in Chapter 9 were used for tracking of both aircraft and  missiles , concurrently, through usage of an agile beam radar .  For another example, air-to-surface operations subdivide into air-to-ground and vessel tracking from the air.  That latter case constrains tracked objects’ altitudes to mean sea level — a substantial benefit since it obviates the need for elevation measurements, which are subject to large errors from refraction (bearing and range measurements, much less severely degraded, suffice). Air-to-ground tracking , by contrast, further subdivides into stationary and moving targets; the former potentially involves imaging possibilities (by real or synthetic aperture) while the latter — if not being imaged by inverse SAR — separates its signature from clutter via doppler.

 

Reentry vehicles, quite different from other track operations, present a unique set of “do’s” and “don’ts” owing to high-precision range measurements combined with much larger cross-range errors (because of proportionality to extreme distances involved).  Pitfalls from uncertain axial direction of “pancake” shaped one-sigma error ellipsoids must be avoided.  A counterexample, having  angle observations only (without distance measurements), is also addressed.   Orbit determination is unique in still another way, often permitting “patched-conic” modeling for its dynamics .  A program based on Lambert’s theorem provides initial trajectories from two position vectors with the time interval separating them.


Those operations and more are addressed with most observations from radar or other (e.g., infrared imaging) sensors rather than satellite measurements.  That of course applies to tracked objects carrying no squitters. Friendlies tracking one another, however, open the door for using GNSS data.  Those subjects plus numerous supporting functions are discussed at some length in Chapter 9.  Despite very different dynamics applicable to various operations, the underlying commonality (Chapter 2) connects the error propagation traits in their estimation algorithms and also — though widely unrecognized — short-term INS error propagation under cruise conditions (Chapters 2 and 5).  Support operations such as synthetic aperture radar ( SAR ) and transfer alignment are described in the chapter Addendum.

 

By James Farrell 09 May, 2023
A look back in time by James L Farrell, PHD - 2023
11 Apr, 2020
Apologies for little posting lately. Much activity included some with deadlines; this will focus primarily on the few years leading up to Covid.
11 Apr, 2020
GNSS Aided Navigation & Tracking
By James Farrell 30 Aug, 2018
Apologies for little posting lately. Much activity included some with deadlines; this will be limited to the past twelve months. In 2017 my involvement in the annual GNSS+ Conference again included teaching the satnav/inertial integration tutorial sessions with OhioU Prof. Frank vanGraas. Part I and Part II are likewise being offered for Sept 2018. Also...Read More
28 Jun, 2018
Once again I am privileged to work with Ohio University Prof. Frank vanGraas, in presenting tutorial sessions at the Institute of Navigation’s GNSS-19 conference. In 2019, as in several consecutive previous years, two sessions will cover integrated navigation with Kalman filtering.  Descriptions of the part 1 session and part 2 session are now available online. By way of...Read More
30 Apr, 2018
The Institute of Navigation’s GNSS+ 2018 Conference provides me the privilege of collaborating with two of the industry’s pillars of expertise. Ohio University Professor Frank van Graas and I are offering fundamental and advanced tutorials.  Then on the last day of the conference I’m coauthored with William Woodward, Chairman of SAE Int’l Aerospace Avionics Systems Division and hardware lead...Read More
24 Apr, 2018
A new SAE standard for GPS receivers is a natural complement to a newly receptive posture toward innovation unmistakably expressed at high levels in FAA and Mitre (ICNS 2018).  Techniques introduced over decades by this author (many on this site) can finally become operational. 1980s euphoria over GPS success was understandable but decision-makers, lulled into complacency, defined requirements in adherence...Read More
22 Mar, 2018
At April’s ICNS meeting (Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance) as coauthor with Bill Woodward (Chairman, SAE International Aerospace Avionics Systems Division), I’ll present “NEW INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS: IMPLICATIONS for FUTURE“.  By “future” we indicate the initiation of a task to conclude with a SAE standard that will necessitate appearance of separate satellite measurements to be included...Read More
16 Jul, 2016
A recent video describes a pair of long-awaited developments that promise dramatic benefits in achievable navigation and tracking performance.  Marked improvements will occur, not only in accuracy and availability; over four decades this topic has arisen in connection with myriad operations, many documented in material cited from other blogs here. 
12 Feb, 2016
For reasons, consider a line from a song in Gilbert-&-Sullivan’s Gondoliers: “When everybody is somebody, then nobody is anybody” — (too many cooks) For consequences, consider this question: Should an intolerable reality remain indefinitely intolerable? While much of the advocacy expressed in my publications and website have focused on tracking and navigation, this tract concentrates...Read More
More Posts
Share by: